In a world filled with generally atrocious and injurious shoes, there are many possible contenders for “worst type of footwear.” In reality, though, there exists a continuum of footwear, ranging from models that are practically unwearable to models that let you realize your full foot potential. Still, and unfortunately, some shoes rise above the rest when it comes to their impact on your foot and musculoskeletal health. Because of the utter ridiculousness of their design and construction, and because of the pervasive and damaging societal expectations surrounding them, women’s high-heeled dress shoes would have to top any list of the most egregious and abusive footwear types.
Stilettos and other high-heeled dress shoes not only contort the foot and force it to navigate an absurd Kitzbühel-esque slope, but they also cause significant foot pain and problems that could otherwise be easily prevented. Indeed, women’s high-heeled shoes take the “prize” for the most offensive and damaging footwear out there, but there are plenty of other types of footwear that are nipping at their (grotesquely elevated) heels. What immediately comes to mind are other kinds of (dressier) women’s footwear, such as clogs (which are commonly, and erroneously, marketed as “good for your feet”) and other thick-soled, rigid platform shoes. Even most conventional dress shoes for men (fancy or otherwise) manage to bind and mangle the foot in an appalling way.
Interesting Side Note: None of the aforementioned footwear types would ever score more than a 2 out of 5 on the NFAR, and most likely quite a bit lower than that.
Now, it’s probably not news to most of you that women’s dress shoes (and even many men’s dress shoes) are bad for the feet, but what are some other examples of toe-battering footwear that we need to consider? Other contenders for the worst type of footwear, in our opinion, include a variety of sport-specific options*—shoes or boots that manufacturers tout (dubiously, in many cases) as essential for optimal athletic performance. These shoes and boots are problematic because of their inherent characteristics, yes, but also because they’re more insidious in their treachery than the aforementioned dress shoes; that is, they often cause foot problems without the wearer even knowing what kind of beastly changes are happening to his or her feet. Dishonorable mention, therefore, goes to the following (in no particular order of heinousness):
Rock Climbing Shoes: These shoes are notoriously uncomfortable, and they unceremoniously route the toes into a crimped, wedge-like position that more closely resembles the head of a pickaxe than a human foot. Most climbing shoes are so tight on the foot as to create a near-hermetic seal, and they are well-known for causing a number of foot problems, ranging from the more innocuous, such as corns and bruises, to the more daunting and damaging, such as bunions, crooked toes, and nerve compression issues. Throw in an increased likelihood of contracting a bacterial, fungal, or viral infection (especially when they are purchased as rentals at indoor facilities), as well as some serious odor, and you have a shoe that will derail your foot health quicker than Alex Honnold can free solo the kiddie route at your local climbing gym.
Cycling Shoes: The problems with conventional cycling shoes—and how to overcome them—have long been documented on this site. Both Dr. Robyn and I are avid road cyclists, and have, in the distant past, had the unfortunate experience of wearing narrow toe box cycling shoes for prolonged periods. Even though the feet are not maximally weight-bearing while cycling, because rides can sometimes last three, four, or five hours (and sometimes even longer), there is a degree of damage that occurs to the foot with conventional cycling shoes that is often unparalleled. Indeed, conventional cycling shoes should be avoided at all costs, which is much easier to do if you adopt an appropriately long platform pedal, as we have, and pair it with some foot-healthy athletic shoes.
Soccer Cleats: Soccer cleats are, by themselves, typical of a lot of other sport-specific footwear; that is: Tapering in the toe box, rigid in the sole, and studded beneath the foot for greater traction on the playing field. The combination of tapering toe box and rigid sole is bad enough, but throw in the destabilizing effect of the cleats themselves (which significantly elevate the entire foot above the ground) and you have a recipe for repeated ankle sprains. Another thing that puts soccer cleats in the upper echelons of footwear offenders is the fact that most wearers are kids and teens, whose feet and bodies are still growing and developing. Soccer cleats, therefore, set many of our kids up for a lifetime of ongoing foot problems. Note: Dr. Robyn spent quite a bit of time wearing this type of cleat during her university rugby days—and even more time enviously watching matches from the sidelines because of repeated footwear-induced ankle injuries.
Dance Shoes: Through our work at Natural Footgear, we often see examples of feet that have suffered mercilessly from a lifetime of confinement in cramped shoes and exhibit a wide variety of preventable deformities. So, we’re no strangers to the maiming effects of conventional footwear. But the degree of damage that results from the combination of strenuous weight-bearing activity and dance-related footwear is often extreme. Whether it’s tap shoes, flamenco shoes, ballroom shoes, or any other such deplorable footwear, dance shoes could not be more incompatible with optimal foot health. Note: Dance shoes vary quite a bit in terms of their design and their impact on the feet. Some, like jazz shoes, are soft and flat and, though certainly far from perfect, probably wouldn’t qualify for the worst-of-the-worst list. But then there are ballroom dancing shoes, for example, which have high heels, are quite stiff in the sole, and possess rather pointy toe boxes (in both women’s and men’s models), so they present a big problem for the feet. And then ballet shoes are among the worst in this category, especially when used for pointe.
Hiking Boots: Have you ever gotten to the end of a long day of hiking and feverishly attempted to pry off your hiking boots in order to relieve the grimace-inducing agony they have caused? Well, we have, many moons ago, before we saw the light and started using sensible footwear that’s actually shaped like a human foot and that allows you to walk with stealth over all sorts of terrain. I’m willing to bet that our experience with hiking footwear is not unique. Rigid, clunky, and far too narrow in the toe box, conventional hiking boots do a major disservice to hikers’ feet and are, by and large, unnecessary. We have, elsewhere on this site, written about the vital importance of and benefits associated with wide toe box footwear for hiking, and we have also dedicated a whole article to the topic of what makes for a truly great hiking boot. Simply put, friends don’t let friends wear conventional hiking boots.
Ski Boots: Both Dr. Robyn and I have some experience with skiing and ski boots from our younger years—she with downhill ski boots on the vertiginous slopes of Colorado’s Winter Park and Copper Mountain resorts; I with cross-country ski boots on the icy forest tracks and trails of Southeastern Ontario. Though we participated in different disciplines of the sport, the one thing we had in common was the abominable state of the footwear we used to slide and glide our way around our various parcours. Though both types of ski boot are far from optimal, between the two, I’d have to say that it’s really downhill ski boots—with their incredibly rigid, cast-like uppers—that cause the most damage to the foot and toes (and that have been putting the “hurt” back in “hurtling” for many decades). I can’t let cross-country ski boots off the hook either, though. Even with a more supple upper, these odious boots can still dish out some serious discomfort and lead to long-term toe misalignment and various other foot problems.
Skates: The conventional wisdom, at least back in the day, among my hockey-playing classmates in grade school, was that you should buy your skates at least two sizes smaller than your normal shoe size and go sockless to achieve a more perfect union between foot, skate, and ice. This was thought to provide a heightened responsiveness to the skater and tighter turning capabilities, among various other purported benefits. I’m not sure how or why this aspect of hockey dogma was passed down through the years, but I do know that jamming your foot into a rigid, two-sizes-too-small skate and then performing high-intensity lateral movements, over and over again—not to mention all that carving and rapid stopping—is not a sound strategy for preserving or attaining long-term foot health. I should add that figure skates and speed skates are equally as, if not more, constricting than hockey skates.
We’d be remiss if we didn’t mention one last type of footwear that is known to be particularly tough on the feet. And that is, cowboy (or cowgirl!) boots. We know that an affinity for this most famous and identifiable style of boot runs deep in many parts of our land, but any boot that can do this to your feet absolutely must be included on a list of the worst types of footwear for foot health. So, if you’re a fan of the cowboy boot but are feeling the pain, we encourage you to find the closest crowbar you can, jimmy those Justins off your feet, and then two-step your way into a pair of footwear that finally lets your feet breathe. And then gently place these cultural icons on a high shelf, just slightly out of reach, where you can admire them from afar.
The truth is, there are many other examples of deleterious footwear that is used on a daily basis by unsuspecting adopters (basketball shoes, running shoes, and other athletic shoes come to mind). The above is simply a non-exhaustive list of some of the most scandalous and shameless miscreants of the bunch. Some may say that the unique demands of social circumstances or the sports mentioned above require the foot to bend to the will of the shoe, and to some small extent (i.e., in certain rare and unique cases), that may be true. But for the most part, the injurious design elements baked into this footwear could be removed or modified without losing much in the way of functionality (and potentially gaining a lot in terms of foot health).
Until that happens, though, and in the event that you cannot avoid using offending footwear of the kind mentioned above, the best policy is to wear these crippling shoes, boots, and other foot coverings for the briefest amount of time possible, get into Correct Toes and truly foot-shaped and foot-healthy men’s and women’s footwear as soon as you can thereafter, and do all the other things in your daily life that help support the development of strong and stable feet and toes.
*This is not to say that the sports themselves are a problem. To the contrary, we think all of these activities, in and of themselves, are great. It’s just the customary footwear used for each one of them that we take issue with from a foot health perspective. This footwear, to the fullest extent possible, needs to be updated or redesigned so that participants can enjoy their sport or activity without suffering a significant cost to foot health.